For Judges, Lawyers, and Evidence Reviewers

    How to verify a CREATORSEAL™ record, read a Receipt of Provenance Record, and understand whether a file matches the version that was sealed.

    This page is for judges, lawyers, mediators, clerks, opposing parties, and professional reviewers who need a clear explanation of what CREATORSEAL™ records, how to run a verification, and what the results mean. It is not legal advice.

    What You May Receive From A Party

    A client, plaintiff, defendant, creator, or party may provide one or more of the following when presenting a CREATORSEAL™ record for review.

    The Original File or Files

    The exact digital file version tied to the sealed record. May be delivered by USB, secure transfer, email, or other method. This is the file that verification is run against.

    The Receipt of Provenance Record

    A human-readable summary that includes the Seal ID, file name, fingerprint, timestamp, and instructions for verification.

    The Seal ID

    A unique identifier for the sealed record. Used to retrieve the sealed record during verification at creatorseal.app/verify.

    The Evidence Bundle

    A portable documentation package that may include the receipt, timestamp data, fingerprint information, and related records — designed for independent third-party review.

    Related Sealed Versions — Lineage History

    A series of related sealed records showing earlier versions, revisions, or successive drafts of the same work. Not always provided, but may help show development history when available.

    How to Verify a File

    Verification requires the original file and the Seal ID. No account or login is required.

    01

    Receive the file and Seal ID

    Obtain the original sealed file and Seal ID from the party. The Seal ID appears in the Receipt of Provenance Record. Keep the received file separate and unmodified before running verification.

    02

    Open the CREATORSEAL™ verification page

    Go to creatorseal.app/verify. No login or account is required to run a verification.

    03

    Enter the Seal ID

    Enter the Seal ID in the verification field. This retrieves the sealed record associated with that ID.

    04

    Drop or select the file

    Select the file or drop it into the verification area. CREATORSEAL™ calculates the file fingerprint locally in your browser — the file is not uploaded to any server.

    05

    Review the result and preserve the file

    CREATORSEAL™ compares the fingerprint of the file you provided to the fingerprint in the sealed record and returns a match or mismatch result. After verification, preserve the file you reviewed. Do not overwrite or resave the original received file.

    A match means the file being checked has the same fingerprint as the file that was sealed. A mismatch does not automatically prove wrongdoing. It means the file being checked is not the exact same file version that was sealed.

    Understanding the Verification Result

    What a Match Means

    • The file fingerprint calculated during verification is identical to the fingerprint recorded in the sealed record
    • Supports that the file being reviewed is the same file version that was sealed at that time
    • Supports the timing and file integrity of that specific version
    • Does not by itself determine authorship, ownership, admissibility, or legal outcome
    • Those determinations are questions for legal counsel and the courts

    What a Mismatch Means

    A mismatch does not automatically prove wrongdoing. It means the file being reviewed is not the exact same file version that was sealed. Common reasons include:

    • The file was reopened and resaved after sealing
    • The file was edited, even minimally
    • The file was converted or exported again in a different format
    • Metadata, punctuation, spacing, or formatting changed
    • A different version of the file was submitted
    • The wrong file was provided for verification

    File Handling and Preservation Notes

    The sealed record is tied to the exact file version at the time of sealing. How the file is handled after sealing matters.

    • Do not casually reopen or resave the exact sealed file version if the sealed version must be preserved for verification — even reopening and resaving without visible edits can change the file fingerprint.
    • Copy the file before review if you need to open it for examination. Keep the original received file separate from working copies.
    • Note the source, date received, method of delivery, and Seal ID when receiving a sealed file. This documentation may be relevant later.
    • If a party must modify the file for any reason, that revised version should be sealed separately as a new record. The original seal remains valid for the original version.
    • Even small changes — a period, a space, a metadata field, a format conversion — may produce a mismatch during verification. This is expected behavior, not a system error.

    Understanding the Receipt of Provenance Record

    The Receipt of Provenance Record is a human-readable summary document associated with a sealed record.

    It is designed to help reviewers identify the record and understand what was sealed. A receipt is a summary document — the technical verification depends on the original file and the Evidence Bundle.

    Seal ID

    A unique identifier for the sealed record

    File Name

    The file name at the time of sealing

    File Fingerprint

    The cryptographic hash tied to the exact file contents

    Timestamp

    The date and time the seal was created

    Version / Lineage

    Relationship to related sealed versions, if applicable

    Verification Instructions

    How to run a verification using the Seal ID and original file

    Understanding Lineage History

    What Lineage Shows

    Lineage history is a series of related sealed records showing successive versions of a file over time. When a creator seals each significant version before sharing it, the resulting records can document the progression from early drafts to final versions.

    • Can show drafts, revisions, finals, exports, or related records at each stage
    • Helps make the development history of a work clearer to reviewers
    • Does not by itself prove authorship, ownership, or legal priority
    • The sequence of sealed versions may be evaluated alongside other evidence

    File Naming and Lineage Clarity

    File names may appear in the Receipt of Provenance Record. Clear, consistent naming makes lineage easier to follow for reviewers. Examples of useful naming patterns:

    Blue Skies v1

    Blue Skies v2

    Blue Skies Final Draft

    050126 Blue Skies Original

    052526 Blue Skies Draft 1

    060326 Blue Skies Draft 2

    Names that include a version number or date make the relationship between sealed versions easier to evaluate.

    Understanding the Evidence Bundle

    The Evidence Bundle is a portable documentation package associated with a sealed record. It is designed to give a third-party reviewer the materials needed to independently verify what was sealed.

    • May include the receipt, timestamp data, file fingerprint information, and verification data
    • May include related records depending on implementation
    • Designed for independent review outside of the CREATORSEAL™ platform if needed
    • The technical layer used alongside the receipt for independent verification

    The Evidence Bundle is not a legal document and does not by itself constitute proof of ownership, authorship, or legal rights.

    Evidence Bundle Tampering and Verification

    The Evidence Bundle as a ZIP package is not the strongest evidence by itself. The strongest evidence is the original file plus the RFC 3161 timestamp token and successful independent verification.

    The bundle can be repackaged. The timestamp token cannot be silently rewritten.

    If the original file is modified

    • CREATORSEAL™ verification hashes the file being checked and compares it to the fingerprint recorded in the sealed record.
    • If even one byte changes — from edits, resaving, format conversion, metadata changes, punctuation, or formatting — the SHA-384 hash changes.
    • The file will not match the sealed record. Verification will indicate a mismatch.
    • This is the easiest form of tampering to detect through standard verification.

    If the RFC 3161 timestamp token is modified

    • The RFC 3161 timestamp token contains the timestamp authority's digital signature over the timestamp data.
    • If someone alters signed fields — the serial, the timestamp time, the message imprint, the policy, or other signed data — the signature check should fail.
    • The token is the most tamper-resistant part of the evidence package. Altering it and maintaining a valid signature requires access to the timestamp authority's private key.

    If human-readable proof text or notes are modified

    • Human-readable proof files and notes are useful for review, but they are not the cryptographic proof.
    • If someone changes a date, serial number, filename, status line, or instruction text in these files, that may create a misleading document.
    • Independent verification against the original file and the RFC 3161 timestamp token can expose inconsistencies between the text files and the actual cryptographic evidence.
    • Human-readable files are supportive, not authoritative.

    If certificate or chain files are modified

    • Altering chain or root certificate files typically causes verification failure rather than producing valid proof.
    • If supplied certificate files are modified, verification may fail to build a valid trust chain.
    • A reviewer may use an independent trusted root store to verify the timestamp authority chain, bypassing any supplied certificate files entirely.

    If the ZIP container is repackaged

    • A ZIP archive can be renamed, recompressed, or have files added or removed without the ZIP itself signaling tampering.
    • The container is packaging. The cryptographic check is whether the original file matches the signed timestamp evidence.
    • Reviewers should verify the original file against the RFC 3161 timestamp token directly, not rely on the container format as evidence of integrity.

    If Tampering Is Suspected

    A lawyer, judge, mediator, opposing party, or expert reviewer should:

    • Preserve the received files without modification
    • Identify the alleged original file
    • Verify the file fingerprint and SHA-384 hash against the sealed record
    • Inspect and verify the RFC 3161 timestamp token independently
    • Verify the certificate chain independently if needed, using a trusted root store
    • Compare the cryptographic result against the Receipt of Provenance Record and any human-readable notes
    • Document any inconsistencies between the cryptographic evidence and the human-readable files

    If the original file still hashes to the value recorded in the signed timestamp token, and the token verifies to a trusted timestamp chain, the cryptographic evidence remains strong. If the file does not match or the token fails verification, the evidence package should be treated as compromised or incomplete until reviewed further.

    The Evidence Bundle is not a legal document and does not by itself prove ownership, authorship, admissibility, or legal rights. Whether any cryptographic evidence is admissible or determinative in a specific proceeding is a question for legal counsel and the courts.

    Best Practices for Parties Submitting Files

    For parties generating a CREATORSEAL™ record that may later be reviewed or submitted.

    • Seal the file before sharing it — not after. The seal is tied to the file version at the moment of sealing.
    • Use clear, consistent file names that describe the version and help reviewers understand the relationship between sealed files.
    • Seal major revisions, milestones, and delivery versions separately — not only the final version.
    • Avoid reopening or resaving the sealed file unless you intend to create a new version. Seal each new version separately.
    • Provide both the original file and the Receipt of Provenance Record when submitting for review.
    • Include the Seal ID in any correspondence, cover letters, or filings that reference the sealed record.
    • Keep notes about when files were transmitted, to whom, by what method, and which Seal ID applies.

    What CREATORSEAL™ Does Not Decide

    CREATORSEAL™ provides a verifiable record that a specific file existed in a specific form at a specific time. It does not decide or determine any of the following:

    • Legal copyright ownership — CREATORSEAL™ does not determine who owns rights in a file or work
    • Authorship — a record does not by itself establish who created the file
    • Admissibility — CREATORSEAL™ does not determine whether a record is admissible in any court or proceeding
    • Intent — a sealed record does not prove what a party intended
    • Independent creation — a record cannot prove that no one else independently created similar work
    • Legal outcome — CREATORSEAL™ does not decide the result of any dispute, claim, or proceeding
    • Infringement — whether infringement occurred is a legal conclusion outside the scope of this system
    • Priority of rights — establishing priority of rights in a work requires legal analysis beyond this record
    • Expert testimony, legal advice, discovery, contracts, notarization, or copyright registration — none of these are replaced by a CREATORSEAL™ record

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Go to creatorseal.app/verify. Enter the Seal ID. Select or drop the file into the verification area. CREATORSEAL™ calculates the file fingerprint locally in the browser and compares it to the fingerprint recorded in the sealed record. The result shows whether the file matches or does not match the sealed version. No technical expertise is required to run a verification.

    A match means the file fingerprint calculated during verification is identical to the fingerprint recorded in the sealed record. This supports that the file being reviewed is the same file version that was sealed at that time. It supports the timing and integrity of that version. A match does not by itself determine authorship, copyright ownership, admissibility, or legal outcome — those are questions for legal counsel and the courts.

    A mismatch means the fingerprint of the file being verified does not match the fingerprint in the sealed record. The file being reviewed is not the exact same file version that was sealed. This does not automatically mean bad faith or wrongdoing. Common reasons include reopening and resaving the file, converting it to a different format, applying a metadata change, or submitting the wrong version of the file.

    Digital file fingerprinting works at the byte level. Reopening and resaving a file — even without changing its visible contents — can alter internal metadata or file structure in ways that change the fingerprint. Changing a single character, space, period, or formatting element changes the byte sequence, which changes the fingerprint. That is why the exact sealed file version must be preserved and handled carefully if later verification may be needed.

    Best practice is to seal before each significant share, handoff, or delivery — not only the final version. Sealing early drafts, revision milestones, and delivery versions creates a lineage history that shows development over time. A party who sealed only the final version has one data point. A party with sealed drafts, revisions, and final versions has a documented timeline that may be more useful in context.

    The Receipt of Provenance Record is a human-readable summary document associated with a seal. It typically includes the Seal ID, file name, file fingerprint, timestamp, and instructions for running a verification. It is designed to help reviewers identify the record and understand what was sealed. The receipt is a summary — the technical verification depends on the original file and the Evidence Bundle.

    Lineage history is a series of related sealed records showing successive versions of a file over time. When a creator seals each significant version before sharing it, the resulting records can document the progression from early drafts to final versions. Lineage does not by itself prove authorship or ownership, but it can help make the development history of a work clearer to reviewers.

    The Evidence Bundle is a portable documentation package associated with a sealed record. It may include the receipt, timestamp data, file fingerprint information, verification data, and related records depending on implementation. It is designed to give a third-party reviewer the materials needed to independently verify what was sealed.

    Changes to the original file break the SHA-384 hash match — if even one byte changes, the file fingerprint will no longer match the fingerprint recorded in the sealed record, and verification will indicate a mismatch. Changes to the RFC 3161 timestamp token should break cryptographic verification, because the token contains the timestamp authority's digital signature over the timestamp data and altering signed fields causes the signature check to fail. Changes to human-readable proof text or notes may create inconsistencies or misleading documents, but they do not rewrite the signed timestamp evidence — independent verification against the original file and the timestamp token can expose those inconsistencies. The ZIP container is not inherently tamper-evident; the cryptographic check is whether the original file still matches the signed timestamp token, and whether that token verifies to a trusted timestamp chain.

    No. CREATORSEAL™ documents that a specific file existed in a specific form at a specific time. It does not determine legal copyright ownership, which involves questions about authorship, jurisdiction, employment agreements, contracts, and other legal factors outside the scope of this system. Copyright ownership should be analyzed by qualified legal counsel.

    A CREATORSEAL™ record may be offered as supporting documentation in a legal matter, but whether it is admissible, how much weight it carries, and what legal conclusions it supports are questions for the courts and the legal counsel involved. CREATORSEAL™ does not make admissibility determinations, and this page is not legal advice.